<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Andrew Lovatt&#039;s Blog &#187; Ogilvy Neo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redmoonmedia.com/blog/tag/ogilvy-neo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redmoonmedia.com/blog</link>
	<description>Critical &#38; Creative Ideas, on &#38; offline</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:53:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Neo Ogilvy &#8211; Alas, Nothing New!</title>
		<link>http://www.redmoonmedia.com/blog/2010/05/neo-ogilvy-alas-nothing-new/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redmoonmedia.com/blog/2010/05/neo-ogilvy-alas-nothing-new/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 09:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ad agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerry McGovern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ogilvy Neo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmoonmedia.com/blog/?p=119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning&#8217;s New Thinking, Gerry McGovern&#8217;s e-newsletter, was titled &#8220;The reason why ad agency websites are truly awful&#8221; pointing out their lack of grasp of web fundamentals &#8211; that people like to &#8220;do&#8221; things and &#8220;interact&#8221; with websites. Most of us in the web industry are aware of the pitfalls of using Flash as the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_128" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 185px"><a href="http://www.redmoonmedia.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/neo-ogilvy-falling-man.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-128" title="neo-ogilvy-falling-man" src="http://www.redmoonmedia.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/neo-ogilvy-falling-man.jpg" alt="Neo Ogilvy Falling Man" width="175" height="230" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Neo Ogilvy - The Falling Man as concept?</p></div>
<p>This morning&#8217;s New Thinking, Gerry McGovern&#8217;s e-newsletter, was titled <a title="click here to read New Thinking enewsletter" href="http://www.gerrymcgovern.com/nt/2010/nt-2010-05-31-Ad-agency.htm" target="_blank"><em><strong>&#8220;The reason why ad agency websites are truly awful&#8221;</strong></em></a> pointing out their lack of grasp of web fundamentals &#8211; that people like to &#8220;do&#8221; things and &#8220;interact&#8221; with websites. Most of us in the web industry are aware of the pitfalls of using Flash as the frontpage or whole site too. Doesn&#8217;t seem like Neo Ogilvy got that message.</p>
<p>So I wasn&#8217;t greatly surprised to find <strong><a title="clck here to visit NeoOgilvy website" href="http://www.neoogilvy.ie" target="_blank">NeoOgilvy.ie</a></strong> is a Flash site. Visually well done. Big typeface messaging. Who We Are, What We Do. Just what you&#8217;d expect from anyone selling their talents. But there is absolutely nothing NEW or NEO about it. Instead Ogilvy rolls out the usual pitch &#8211; <em>we do it all</em>. This is 2010. What were they doing for the last decade?</p>
<p>Under <strong>&#8220;What&#8217;s Different?</strong>&#8221; it says: &#8220;Our fluid understanding of digital territories underpins our approach to the development and delivery of successful consumer engagement strategies&#8230;&#8221; That sounds fine. But there isn&#8217;t any sign that Ogilvy actually grasp what &#8220;interactivity&#8221; is about. The website is an advertisement, a one-way broadcast. This doesn&#8217;t add up to a &#8220;fluid understanding of digital&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Ogilvy needed to &#8220;show &amp; tell&#8221; with NeoOgilvy &#8211; big time. Alas, there&#8217;s nothing new here. Except perhaps the frontpage image of a falling man. Is this image meant to impress their clients? Who exactly is falling? Client or agency? In our current climate it is an unnerving image &amp; reminds of those who jumped off skyscrapers in New York as the Stock Market crashed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redmoonmedia.com/blog/2010/05/neo-ogilvy-alas-nothing-new/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

